Efficacy of Medicinal Plants on Gastrointestinal Parasites in Small Ruminants in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol
Keywords:
Medicinal plants, Gastrointestinal parasites, Small ruminants, Africa, Anthelmintic efficacyAbstract
Gastrointestinal parasitic infections represent a critical challenge to the health and productivity of small ruminants in Africa. The extensive use and misuse of synthetic anthelmintics have accelerated resistance, necessitating sustainable alternatives such as medicinal plants. Despite increasing attention, reported efficacies of these phytotherapeutic interventions remain inconsistent. This study aims to systematically review and quantify the efficacy of medicinal plants used in Africa for controlling gastrointestinal parasites (GIPs) in sheep and goats. Specifically, it seeks to: (i) estimate pooled effect sizes of medicinal plants against GIPs, (ii) identify the most commonly used species and their administration modes, (iii) assess variations in efficacy across plant types, geographic zones, experimental designs, and host species, (iv) evaluate methodological quality and risk of bias of included studies, and (v) identify knowledge gaps and future research priorities. Following PRISMA-P guidelines, this study will perform a systematic search across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, CAB Abstracts, SpringerLink, Medline, Cochrane, AJOL, and Google Scholar for studies published between 1990 and 2025. Eligible studies will include randomized and non-randomized controlled trials and observational designs assessing the antiparasitic effects of medicinal plants in small ruminants. Data will be synthesized using a random-effects meta-analysis model, and methodological quality will be critically appraised with a standardized tool. This review will generate pooled efficacy estimates, provide evidence-based recommendations, and support the integration of ethnoveterinary medicine into sustainable parasite management strategies in African livestock production.
References
[1]Park YW, Haenlein GFW. Goat milk, its products and nutrition. Handbook of Food Products Manufacturing. 2006, 449-488. DOI: 10.1002/9780470113554.ch69
[2]Food and Agriculture Organisation. La Situation mondiale de l’alimentation et de l’agriculture 2020. 2020, 28. DOI: 10.4060/cb1441fr
[3]Morgan ER, Charlier J, Hendrickx G, Biggeri A, Catalan D, Von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, et al. Global change and helminth infections in grazing ruminants in Europe: Impacts, trends and sustainable solutions. Agriculture. 2013, 3(3), 484-502. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture3030484
[4]Mehmood K, Zhang H, Sabir AJ, Abbas RZ, Ijaz M, Durrani AZ, et al. A review on epidemiology, global prevalence and economical losses of fasciolosis in ruminants. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2017, 109, 253-262. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.06. 006
[5]Rashid M, Akbar H, Rashid I, Saeed K, Ahmad L, Ahmad AS, et al. Economic significance of tropical theileriosis on a Holstein Friesian dairy farm in Pakistan. Journal of Parasitology. 2018, 104(3), 310-312. DOI: 10.1645/16-179
[6]Fentahun T. Systematic review on gastrointestinal helminths of domestic ruminants in Ethiopia. Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research. 2020, 10(5), 216-230. DOI: 10.51227/ojafr.2020.31
[7]Showkat Ahmad Bhat, Manzoor Ur Rahman Mir, Sawleha Qadir, Idrees Mehraj Allaie, Hilal Musadiq Khan, Ishraq Husain, et al. Prevalence of gastro-intestinal parasitic infections in Sheep of Kashmir valley of India. 2012, 5(11), 667-671. DOI: 10.5455/vetworld.2012.667-671
[8]Mezgebu T, Tafess K, Tamiru F. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites of horses and donkeys in and around Gondar town, Ethiopia. Open Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2013, 3(6), 267-272. DOI: 10.4236/ojvm.2013.36043
[9]Kaplan RM, Vidyashankar AN. An inconvenient truth: global anthelmintic resistance. Veterinary Parasitology. 2013, 186(1-2), 70-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.048
[10]Kotze AC, Prichard RK. Anthelminthic resistance in Haemonchus contortus: history, mechanisms and diagnosis. Advances in Parasitology. 2016, 93, 397-428. DOI: 10.1016/bs.apar.2016.02.012
[11]Molento MB. Parasite control in the age of drug resistance and changing agricultural practices. Veterinary Parasitology. 2009, 163(3), 229-234. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.06.007
[12]Hrckova G, Velebny S. Parasitic helminths of humans and animals: health impact and control. In: Pharmacological Potential of Selected Natural Compounds in the Control of Parasitic Diseases. Springer. 2013, 29-99. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1325-7_2
[13]Hoste H, Torres-Acosta JF, Sandoval-Castro CA, Mueller-Harvey I, Sotiraki S, Louvandini H, et al. Tannin-containing legumes as a natural alternative to control gastrointestinal parasites in grazing livestock. Veterinary Parasitology. 2015, 212(1-2), 5-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.06.026
[14]Pohl F, Kong T, Lin P. The potential use of plant natural products and plant extracts with antioxidant properties for the prevention/treatment of neurodegenerative diseases: in vitro, in vivo and clinical trials. Molecules. 2018, 23(12), 3283. DOI: 10.3390/molecules23123283
[15]Adhikari B, Marasini BP, Rayamajhee B, Bhattarai BR, Lamichhane G, Khadayat K, et al. Potential roles of medicinal plants for the treatment of viral diseases focusing on COVID‐19: A review. Phytotherapy Research. 2021, 35(3), 1298-1312. DOI: 10.1002/ptr.6893
[16]Hoste H, Jackson F, Athanasiadou S, Thamsborg SM, Hoskin SO. The effects of tannin-rich plants on parasitic nematodes in ruminants. Trends in Parasitology. 2006 22(6), 253-261. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2006.04.004
[17]Eguale T, Tadesse D, Giday M. In vitro anthelmintic activity of crude extracts of five medicinal plants against egg hatching and larval development of Haemonchus contortus. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2011, 137(1), 108-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.04.063
[18]Nawaz M, Sajid MS, Zulfiqar A, Muhammad W, Tanveer A, Abid H, et al. Anti-tick activity of leaves of Azadirachta indica, Dalbergia sisso and Morus alba against Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Acta Parasitologica Globalis. 2015, 6(1), 60-64. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.apg.2015.6.1.93220
[19]Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal. 2021, 372, n71. DOI:10.1136/bmj.n71
[20]Sayers EW, Beck J, Bolton EE, Bourexis D, Brister JR, Canese K, et al. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Research. 2021, 49(D1), D10-D17. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa892
[21]Halevi Gali; Henk Moed, Judit Bar-Ilan. Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluatio__Review of the Literature. Journal of Informetrics. 2017, 11(3), 823-834. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.06.005
[22]Birkle C, David A. Pendlebury, Schnell J, Adams J. Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. 2020, 1(1), 363-376. DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00018
[23]Thelwall M, Pardeep Sud. Scopus 1900-2020: Growth in articles, abstracts, countries, fields, and journals. Quantitative Science Studies. 2022, 3(1), 37-50. DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00177
[24]Gusenbauer M, Haddaway NR. Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods. 2020, 11(2), 181-217. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1378
[25]That J. CABI Global Health, more than just a database: a fresh perspective on global literature with a not-for-profit impact. Journal of the European Association of Health Information and Libraries. 2025, 21(1), 8-13. DOI: 10.32384/jeahil21662
[26]Oermann MH, Wrigley J, Nicoll LH, Ledbetter LS, Carter-Templeton H, Edie AH. Integrity of databases for literature searches in nursing: Avoiding predatory journals. Advances in Nursing Science. 2021, 44(2), 102-110. DOI: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000349
[27]Smart P. African Journals OnLine (AJOL). Serials Review. 2005, 31(4), 261-265. DOI: 10.1016/j.serrev.2005.09.007
[28]Puga MEDS, Atallah ÁN. Cochrane Library: the best evidence within everyone's reach. Sao Paulo Medical Journal. 2020, 138(5), 355-358. DOI, 10.1590/1516-3180.2020.138527102020
[29]Manterola C, Otzen T, Calo, L. Electronic resources for searching health scientific information. Database publication type. International Journal of Morphology. 2014, 32(4), 1484 -1491.
[30]Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, de Vries RB, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Langendam MW. SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014, 14, 43. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-43
[31]Macleod MR, Lawson McLean A, Kyriakopoulou A, Serghiou S, de Wilde A, Sherratt N, et al. Risk of bias in reports of in vivo research: a focus for improvement. PLoS Biology. 2015, 13(10), e1002273. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002273
[32]Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, et al. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis: Systematic review of etiology and risk. Joanna Briggs Institute. 2020. DOI: 10.46658/JBIMES-24-06
[33]Muthuraj A, Rajkumar T, J. Issac Arputharaj. EndNote: Reference management tool for managing research. Online Tools for Librarians. 2018, 107-114.
[34]Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid N. Rayyan__A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews. 2016, 5(210). DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
[35]Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal. 1997, 315(7109), 629-634. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
[36]Githiori JB, Hoglund J, Waller PJ. Ethnoveterinary plant preparations as livestock dewormers: practices, popular beliefs, pitfalls, and prospects for the future. Animal Health Research Reviews. 2005, 6(1), 91-103. DOI:10.1079/AHR2005099
[37]Zinsstag J, Schelling E, Roth F, Bonfoh B, de Savigny D, Tanner M. Human benefits of animal interventions for zoonoses control. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2007, 13(4), 527-531. DOI: 10.3201/eid1304.060381
[38]Roeber F, Kahn L. The specific diagnosis of gastrointestinal nematode infections in livestock: Larval culture technique, its limitations and alternative DNA-based approaches. Veterinary Parasitology. 2014, 205, 619-628. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.08.005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aboudou Habirou Kifouly, Géorcelin Alowanou, Pierre Challaton, Fréjus Tanguy Zinsou, Claude Houssoukpè, Abdou Satar Akadiri, John Dossou, Gilles-Christ Akakpo, Cyrille Kodoéito Boko (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
